Last modified: 2014-07-29 19:09:03 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T69992, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
Bug 67992 - VisualEditor: Easy way to trigger a snowman and other corruption at fr.wp
VisualEditor: Easy way to trigger a snowman and other corruption at fr.wp
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: VisualEditor
Classification: Unclassified
ContentEditable (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: High major
: VE-deploy-2014-07-31
Assigned To: Editing team bugs – take if you're interested!
:
: 68124 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2014-07-14 15:52 UTC by Elitre
Modified: 2014-07-29 19:09 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description Elitre 2014-07-14 15:52:06 UTC
Based on feedback and test by French Wikipedians, which we always thank.

An editor reported getting a snowman here https://fr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lucien_Dayle&diff=next&oldid=105411841 when all he did was removing a comma (Chrome, Mac OS X).
I wasn't able to reproduce https://fr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Utilisateur%3AElitre_%28WMF%29%2FProve2&diff=105432197&oldid=105432184 .

Then another user created a sandbox with similar templates in it and I tested there as well; https://fr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Utilisateur%3AZebulon84%2FBrouillon&diff=105432505&oldid=105431985 the snowman showed up in the exact place where I had added a comma.

In another case instead https://fr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Utilisateur%3AZebulon84%2FBrouillon&diff=105432576&oldid=105432561 the letter "e" shows up where I had put the comma. The user had previously replaced the template {{e}} with <sup> tags (https://fr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Utilisateur:Zebulon84/Brouillon&diff=prev&oldid=105422272 ).
Comment 1 James Forrester 2014-07-26 02:26:22 UTC
Comments from Erica on another bug:

> I believe this is happening again at it.wp.
> See https://it.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=AA.VV.&diff=prev&oldid=67188720 (snowmen) or https://it.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Utente:Elitre_(WMF)/Pagina_delle_prove_VE&diff=next&oldid=67195802 (pawn).
> What you need to reproduce: just create a base reference, add the template Cita, add something as its first parameter, then hit Space/type something else in the reference before saving.
> 
> More examples from it.wp: https://it.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Natale_Ciravolo&diff=67212907&oldid=67197341 , https://it.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Utente:Nnvu/Sandbox1&diff=prev&oldid=67108020 .
Comment 2 WhatamIdoing 2014-07-28 17:26:18 UTC
Note from Jay8g:

In this edit [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hong_Kong_International_Airport&diff=618742880&oldid=618629367], I got a snowman after rearranging (copy and paste) a sentence with {{convert}}. This did not show up in VE itself, and appeared in place of the comma that I had actually added (and that had displayed in VE).

This seems to be the same problem.
Comment 3 Gerrit Notification Bot 2014-07-28 18:52:58 UTC
Change 149920 had a related patch set uploaded by Catrope:
Generate only one pair of snowmen for multi-sibling nodes

https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/149920
Comment 4 Gerrit Notification Bot 2014-07-29 00:49:34 UTC
Change 149920 had a related patch set uploaded by Jforrester:
Generate only one pair of snowmen for multi-sibling nodes

https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/149920
Comment 5 James Forrester 2014-07-29 01:54:42 UTC
*** Bug 68124 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 6 Gerrit Notification Bot 2014-07-29 10:34:36 UTC
Change 149920 merged by jenkins-bot:
Generate only one pair of snowmen for multi-sibling nodes

https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/149920
Comment 7 Gerrit Notification Bot 2014-07-29 14:51:17 UTC
Change 150222 had a related patch set uploaded by Jforrester:
Generate only one pair of snowmen for multi-sibling nodes

https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/150222
Comment 8 Gerrit Notification Bot 2014-07-29 14:51:33 UTC
Change 150222 abandoned by Jforrester:
Generate only one pair of snowmen for multi-sibling nodes

https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/150222
Comment 9 Gerrit Notification Bot 2014-07-29 14:58:54 UTC
Change 150224 had a related patch set uploaded by Jforrester:
Generate only one pair of snowmen for multi-sibling nodes

https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/150224
Comment 10 Gerrit Notification Bot 2014-07-29 14:59:19 UTC
Change 150224 abandoned by Jforrester:
Generate only one pair of snowmen for multi-sibling nodes

https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/150224
Comment 11 Gerrit Notification Bot 2014-07-29 15:01:32 UTC
Change 150224 restored by Jforrester:
Generate only one pair of snowmen for multi-sibling nodes

https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/150224
Comment 12 Gerrit Notification Bot 2014-07-29 15:02:53 UTC
Change 150224 abandoned by Jforrester:
Generate only one pair of snowmen for multi-sibling nodes

Reason:
I give up.

https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/150224
Comment 13 Gerrit Notification Bot 2014-07-29 17:59:25 UTC
Change 150274 had a related patch set uploaded by Catrope:
Generate only one pair of snowmen for multi-sibling nodes

https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/150274
Comment 14 Gerrit Notification Bot 2014-07-29 18:32:14 UTC
Change 150224 restored by Catrope:
Generate only one pair of snowmen for multi-sibling nodes

https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/150224
Comment 15 Gerrit Notification Bot 2014-07-29 18:36:24 UTC
Change 150274 merged by jenkins-bot:
Generate only one pair of snowmen for multi-sibling nodes

https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/150274
Comment 16 Gerrit Notification Bot 2014-07-29 18:36:45 UTC
Change 150224 merged by jenkins-bot:
Generate only one pair of snowmen for multi-sibling nodes

https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/150224
Comment 17 James Forrester 2014-07-29 19:09:03 UTC
Should be now fully fixed in master; deployment to production scheduled for 4 hours' time.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links