Last modified: 2011-04-14 15:11:05 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T15599, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
Bug 13599 - Expand spam blacklist to include edit and other summaries
Expand spam blacklist to include edit and other summaries
Status: NEW
Product: MediaWiki extensions
Classification: Unclassified
Spam Blacklist (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Low enhancement with 6 votes (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Specia...
:
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2008-04-03 05:10 UTC by Nobody
Modified: 2011-04-14 15:11 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description Nobody 2008-04-03 05:10:55 UTC
While the spam blacklist works for article content, it fails to affect edit summaries and log entry reasons. At least one abusive user is utilizing this hole in our defenses.
Comment 1 Cometstyles 2008-04-03 05:16:08 UTC
Agreed, its a simple trolling bug which really must be fixed, since links to badsites can be abused through this, and the spam filter doesn't really pick this up and possibly creating something like [[MediaWiki:EditSummaryBlacklist]] (just an idea) can fix it...
Comment 2 Nobody 2008-04-03 05:39:50 UTC
Er, I was more intending for this to use the existing spam blacklist and apply it to edit summaries also. Fewer pages to monitor. No reason I can think of to make two separate lists. I proposed this as a change to http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:SpamBlacklist
Comment 3 Brion Vibber 2008-04-03 22:53:52 UTC
There are no clickable links there, so the blacklist wouldn't apply.
Comment 4 Ral315 2008-04-04 02:08:01 UTC
Nevertheless, spammers use edit summaries encouraging users to visit nimp.org (don't actually go there, it's a shock site that'll probably crash your browser).  While they're not clickable, it wouldn't be good to have those kind of entries in the history either.
Comment 5 Hersfold 2008-06-09 01:13:47 UTC
This is still an issue and could really use some looking into. We've had a few users (who shall go unnamed) go through a temporary lack of common sense and go to these sites, clickable or not. It seems to me this could just use a simple regex scan of the edit summary - it's pretty easy to tell what a link looks like, so it's very unlikely we'd get any false alarms on this.
Comment 6 Chad H. 2008-06-19 03:15:55 UTC
Partially fixed as of r36439. Log entries aren't scanned yet, but edit summaries now are.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links